A new mechanism for resolving bargaining impasses between risk-averse parties
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a sequential bargaining game framework with complete information and no discounting, this paper proposes a mechanism in the spirit of a final offers arbitration (FOA). At each step, two parties may stop negotiating in order to implement a lottery between the two current proposals or go on making new proposals. A crucial difference with the FOA is that the list of past proposals is recorded and used by the mechanism. Once a lottery has been implemented, the parties can reject the offer which has been drawn and go back to a lottery between proposals made in the past. At the dominant subgame perfect equilibrium the two parties make gradual concessions leading to a final agreement which coincides with the Raiffa solution. The main incentive to reach an agreement comes from risk-aversion. The necessity to make step by step concessions generates evolving disagreement points and gradualism.
منابع مشابه
A Mechanism for Solving Bargaining Problems between Risk Averse Parties
We propose a mechanism for resolving bargaining problems. The mechanism allows two players to make a sequence of simultaneous propositions. At any step, as long as the players have not reached an agreement, they can choose to implement a lottery between the di erent propositions. In this aspect, the mechanism is similar to the so called nal o ers arbitration. However, contrary to the existing s...
متن کاملHow Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?
We follow a new approach for the implementation of cooperative bargaining solutions in a non-cooperative framework. We model what happens in case of disagreement in order to give players the incentive to reach an agreement which coincides with a cooperative solution. Our model consist of two phases. Many of the standard bargaining procedures can constitute the first phase. The second mechanism ...
متن کاملEquitable Risk Allocation in Construction Projects: Fuzzy Bargaining Game Approach
An equitable risk allocation between contracting parties plays a vital role in enhancing the performance of the project. This research presents a new quantitative risk allocation approach by integrating fuzzy logic and bargaining game theory. Owing to the imprecise and uncertain nature of players’ payoffs at different risk allocation strategies, fuzzy logic is implemented to determine the value...
متن کاملNash bargaining and risk aversion
It is widely accepted among axiomatic bargaining theorists that if one bargainer is more risk averse than a second, the second will be a tougher bargaining opponent than the first against all opponents. We argue that this relationship between risk aversion and bargaining toughness is both highly fragile, and more nuanced than previously articulated. In the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining ...
متن کاملArtificial Computer-Assisted International Negotiation: A Tool for Research and Practice
This article describes a web-based computer-assisted tool for diagnosing progress in international negotiation. Following a discussion of the need for such a tool, we provide the research sources for its development, present the model on which it is based, describe how it works, and present the results of attempts to validate its diagnoses with case materials. Focusing on flexibility in negotia...
متن کامل